Johannesburg

Shaniaé Maharaj

Associate

We are passionate about the work we do and proud of the quality of work we produce for our clients.

We have a team of highly skilled, dedicated and efficient lawyers across various practice areas.

We understand that each of our client’s needs is unique, and we strive to ensure legal excellence in meeting each challenge.

We have extensive experience in the South African legal system and have advised widely across the Southern African region.

We are passionate about the work we do and proud of the quality of work we produce for our clients.

We have a team of highly skilled, dedicated and efficient lawyers across various practice areas.

We understand that each of our client’s needs is unique, and we strive to ensure legal excellence in meeting each challenge.

We have extensive experience in the South African legal system and have advised widely across the Southern African region.

We are passionate about the work we do and proud of the quality of work we produce for our clients.

We have a team of highly skilled, dedicated and efficient lawyers across various practice areas.

We understand that each of our client’s needs is unique, and we strive to ensure legal excellence in meeting each challenge.

We have extensive experience in the South African legal system and have advised widely across the Southern African region.

Learn more about us.

Meet our team of experts.

Catch up on the latest Cheadle Thompson & Haysom announcements and news.

The Labour Court, in Rotunda Proprietary Limited v Sam, considered whether a former employee who breached a restraint of trade that had been made an order of court was guilty of contempt of court in circumstances where the underlying restraint of trade had, by effluxion of time, expired.

The Labour Court, in Rotunda Proprietary Limited v Sam, considered whether a former employee who breached a restraint of trade that had been made an order of court was guilty

The Labour Court, in Rotunda Proprietary Limited v Sam, considered...

On 28 November 2025, the Supreme Court of Appeal (“SCA”) handed down judgment in Tekoa Consulting Engineers (Pty) Ltd v Alfred Nzo District Municipality \[2025\] ZASCA 180, declaring tender documents unlawful for vagueness, despite the work already having been completed.

On 28 November 2025, the Supreme Court of Appeal (“SCA”) handed down judgment in Tekoa Consulting Engineers (Pty) Ltd v Alfred Nzo District Municipality \[2025\] ZASCA 180, declaring tender documents

On 28 November 2025, the Supreme Court of Appeal (“SCA”)...

On 29 May 2026, the Constitutional Court in NUMSA and Others v Industrial Oleo Chemical Products \[2026\] ZACC \[22\] clarified that, in a facilitated largescale retrenchment, it is not necessary to first refer a dispute to conciliation before approaching the Labour Court to challenge the substantive fairness of the dismissal. The judgment brings certainty in relation to section 189A(7) of the Labour Relations Act (“LRA”), following a line of conflicting judgments in the Labour and Labour Appeal Courts.

On 29 May 2026, the Constitutional Court in NUMSA and Others v Industrial Oleo Chemical Products \[2026\] ZACC \[22\] clarified that, in a facilitated largescale retrenchment, it is not necessary

On 29 May 2026, the Constitutional Court in NUMSA and...

Enquiries

Contact Shaniaé

Please fill in your details below and we will be in touch.

This is a design prototype — submissions are not sent anywhere.